Blood is thicker than water. At least that's what they say. But sometimes there is just too much blood. Mother does not always know best, especially when you are a mother in name only.
When a biological mother is unfit to raise her own child, wouldn't the right thing be to let her live with a family that will love her unconditionally regardless of the fact that the child is not really theirs?
Sometimes non-biological mothers end up being much better mother than biological ones. Do you ever notice how people who don't want to be parents end up having kids but the ones that want to give their undying love are the ones who are unable to have them? The biggest fallacy is that you cannot love your non-biological child the same way you would if the child was yours biologically. A child is a child and is very deserving of love. We adults have lived our lives and now it's time to pass the torch. When speaking of a mother's natural instinct however, who says that a mother by ACTION and NOT just NAME only, cannot feel nor sense when her own child is in some kind of danger?
Court rules in favor of the REAL parent.